Showing posts with label knn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label knn. Show all posts

Friday

K-NN algorithm few facts

 

Thomas from Unplus

k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) can be used for classification tasks. In k-NN classification, the algorithm assigns a class label to an unknown sample based on the class labels of its k nearest neighbours in the feature space. It calculates the distance between the unknown sample and the training samples, and the k nearest neighbours with the shortest distance are used to determine the class label of the unknown sample.

The choice of k, the number of nearest neighbours, is an important parameter in k-NN classification. A smaller value of k tends to make the classification more sensitive to local variations, while a larger value of k smooths out the decision boundaries. The appropriate value of k depends on the dataset and the specific classification problem at hand.

It’s worth noting that k-NN is a simple and intuitive classification algorithm, but it can be computationally expensive for large datasets since it requires calculating distances between the unknown sample and all training samples. Additionally, k-NN assumes that the feature space is relevant to the classification task, and it may not perform well in high-dimensional spaces or with noisy data.

Yes, k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) can also be used for regression tasks, in addition to classification. In k-NN regression, instead of assigning a class label to an unknown sample, the algorithm predicts a continuous value (e.g., a numerical output) based on the values of its k-nearest neighbours.

To perform k-NN regression, the algorithm calculates the distances between the unknown sample and the training samples, just like in k-NN classification. However, instead of using the class labels of the nearest neighbours, it takes into account their corresponding output values. The predicted value for the unknown sample is typically the average (or weighted average) of the output values of its k nearest neighbours.

Similar to k-NN classification, the choice of k is an important parameter in k-NN regression. A smaller value of k can result in more localized predictions, while a larger value of k can lead to smoother predictions that incorporate more global information.

It’s worth noting that k-NN regression, like k-NN classification, has its limitations. It assumes that the feature space is relevant to the regression task, and it may not perform well in high-dimensional spaces or with noisy data. Additionally, the choice of k and the distance metric used can significantly impact the regression results.

The boundary becomes smoother with an increasing value of K

When you increase the value of k in k-nearest neighbours (k-NN), the bias tends to increase.

When you find noise in the data, decreasing the value of k in k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) can help mitigate the impact of noise. Smaller values of k allow the algorithm to focus more on local patterns and disregard outliers or noisy data points.

No, the k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithm does not typically take more time in the test phase than in the training phase. The training phase of k-NN involves storing the training dataset, which is a simple and fast process. During the test phase, the algorithm compares the test samples to the stored training samples to determine the nearest neighbors. The time complexity of k-NN during the test phase depends on the size of the training dataset and the dimensionality of the feature space.

However, it’s worth noting that the test phase of k-NN can be computationally expensive for large datasets, as it requires calculating distances between the test samples and all the training samples. The time required for the test phase can increase as the size of the training dataset grows. Additionally, if the feature space is high-dimensional, the curse of dimensionality can make the distance calculations more time-consuming.

The k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) algorithm can be used to impute missing values for both categorical and continuous variables. K-NN imputation is a technique where missing values are replaced with values from the k nearest neighbours based on their similarity in the feature space. It can handle both categorical and continuous variables by considering appropriate distance metrics and imputing values accordingly.

While linear regression and logistic regression are commonly used for predictive modelling tasks, they are not specifically designed for imputing missing values. They can be used for imputation in certain scenarios, but they are typically more suitable for predicting the values of a target variable based on other variables rather than filling in missing values directly.

Ridge regression, like linear regression, is primarily used for predictive modeling tasks rather than directly imputing missing values. While ridge regression can handle missing values in the input variables, it does not have a built-in mechanism specifically designed for imputation.

To use ridge regression for imputing missing values, you would need to first impute the missing values using another imputation method or technique, and then use the imputed dataset as input for ridge regression.

Therefore, ridge regression itself is not typically used as a direct imputation method for handling missing values for both categorical and continuous variables.

The best value for k in k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) depends on various factors, including the nature of the dataset, the number of samples, and the complexity of the problem. There is no universally optimal value for k that applies to all scenarios. It is recommended to consider factors such as the size of the dataset and the underlying data distribution to select an appropriate value for k.

That being said, in the given options, it is generally advisable to start with smaller values of k, such as 3 or 10, as they tend to capture more local patterns and can be effective in scenarios where the data has clear boundaries or localized structures. However, if the dataset is large or contains more complex patterns, a larger value of k, such as 20 or 50, might be more appropriate. Larger values of k can help smooth out the decision boundaries and reduce the impact of noise or outliers.

Ultimately, it is recommended to experiment with different values of k and perform cross-validation or other model evaluation techniques to determine the optimal value for a specific problem and dataset.

You can get more details about KNN here

Thank you

Handling Large Binary Data with Azure Synapse

  Photo by Gül Işık Handling large binary data in Azure Synapse When dealing with large binary data types like geography or image data in Az...