Preciasion, Recall and F1 Score in Machine Learning

 

Precision and recall are two metrics used to evaluate the performance of a classifier in binary classification problems.

• Precision measures the accuracy of positive predictions. It is calculated by dividing the number of true positives by the total number of positive predictions.
• Recall measures the completeness of positive predictions. It is calculated by dividing the number of true positives by the total number of actual positives.

For example, let's say we have a classifier that predicts whether an email is spam or not. The classifier correctly predicts that 8 emails are spam and incorrectly predicts that 2 emails are not spam. There are actually 12 spam emails in the dataset.

In this case, the precision of the classifier is 8/10 = 0.8, and the recall is 8/12 = 0.67.

• Precision is often used when the cost of false positives is high. For example, in the spam filtering example, a false positive would be an email that is incorrectly classified as spam. This could lead to the email being deleted, which could be a problem if the email is important.
• Recall is often used when the cost of false negatives is high. For example, in the medical diagnosis example, a false negative would be a patient who is incorrectly classified as not having a disease. This could lead to the patient not receiving the treatment they need, which could be a serious problem.

The ideal classifier would have perfect precision and recall, but this is rarely possible. In most cases, there is a trade-off between precision and recall. Increasing precision typically reduces recall, and vice versa.

The best way to choose between precision and recall depends on the specific application. For example, if the cost of false positives is high, then precision should be prioritized. If the cost of false negatives is high, then recall should be prioritized.

Here are some other examples of precision and recall:

• A medical diagnostic test with a precision of 0.9 and a recall of 0.8 means that the test correctly identifies 90% of the patients who have the disease and 80% of the patients who do not have the disease.
• A spam filtering algorithm with a precision of 0.8 and a recall of 0.6 means that the algorithm correctly identifies 80% of the spam emails and 60% of the non-spam emails.
• A search engine with a precision of 0.7 and a recall of 0.5 means that the search engine correctly returns 70% of the relevant results and 50% of all the results.

The F1 score is a measure of a model's accuracy that combines precision and recall. It is calculated as the harmonic mean of precision and recall. The harmonic mean is more sensitive to low values than the arithmetic mean, so it gives more weight to the lower of the two scores.

The F1 score is often used in machine learning and natural language processing to evaluate the performance of binary classifiers. A binary classifier is a model that predicts one of two classes, such as spam or not spam, or positive or negative.

The F1 score is calculated as follows:

F1 = 2 * (precision * recall) / (precision + recall)

where:

• Precision is the number of true positives divided by the number of true positives plus the number of false positives.
• Recall is the number of true positives divided by the number of true positives plus the number of false negatives.

The F1 score can range from 0 to 1, where 1 is the best possible score. A score of 0 means that the model is not making any correct predictions, and a score of 1 means that the model is making perfect predictions.

The F1 score is a good measure of a model's accuracy because it takes into account both precision and recall. Precision measures how accurate the model is, while recall measures how complete the model is. The F1 score gives more weight to the lower of the two scores, so it is a good measure of a model's overall performance.

The F1 score is often used in conjunction with other metrics, such as accuracy, to evaluate the performance of a model. Accuracy is the percentage of predictions that the model makes correctly. The F1 score and accuracy can be complementary metrics, as a model can have a high accuracy but a low F1 score if it is only predicting one class of data.

The F1 score is a useful metric for evaluating the performance of binary classifiers. It is a good measure of a model's overall accuracy and takes into account both precision and recall. The F1 score is often used in conjunction with other metrics, such as accuracy, to get a more complete picture of a model's performance.

We can get the TP, FP, FN, and FP from the confusion matrix.

Here is a confusion matrix for the spam filtering example:

Actual Spam | Predicted Spam | Predicted Not Spam

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spam | True Positive (TP) | False Negative (FN)

Not Spam | False Positive (FP) | True Negative (TN)

True Positive (TP): The email is actually spam and is correctly classified as spam.

False Negative (FN): The email is actually spam but is incorrectly classified as not spam.

False Positive (FP): The email is not spam but is incorrectly classified as spam.

True Negative (TN): The email is not spam and is correctly classified as not spam.

In this case, the TP is 8, the FN is 4, the FP is 2, and the TN is 10.

The confusion matrix can be used to calculate precision and recall. Precision is calculated by dividing the TP by the sum of the TP and FP. Recall is calculated by dividing the TP by the sum of the TP and FN.

In this case, the precision is 8/10 = 0.8, and the recall is 8/12 = 0.67.

Photo by Thomas Griggs on Unsplash